[A diabetic patient with a fulminant hand infection caused by a domestic rat bite].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Animal bite wounds are common and can cause serious hand infections. Risk factors not only include the oral flora of the animal and the anatomy of the teeth, but also the comorbidities of the bitten patient. CASE DESCRIPTION: In this case report we describe a 46-years old female patient with comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus type 2 and peripheral artery disease, suffering a fulminant hand infection after a domestic rat bite with the newly described bacterium Rodentibacterratti. Despite extensive antibiotic therapy and surgical debridement, a ray amputation was inevitable to maintain adequate hand function. CONCLUSION: Infections after animal bites may be caused by a variety of pathogens. The pathogen Rodentibacterratti has not previously been associated with infections in humans and future research is indicated to assess therapeutic strategies. Patients should be referred to a (plastic) surgeon if there is no clinical improvement within 48 hours of initiating antibiotic treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".