MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4388953599 · doi:10.4000/books.dameae.1086

Léon Bourgeois dans les Archives diplomatiques

2022· book-chapter· fr· W4388953599 on OpenAlexaff
Clément Noual

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesBourgeoisiePolitical scienceArtPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les archives du ministère des Affaires étrangères conservent de Léon Bourgeois un fonds d’archives personnelles, depuis son décès survenu en 1925. Classés et inventoriés depuis 1971, ces papiers sont mis à la disposition des chercheurs dans la sous-série 29PAAP. Malgré un volume faible en comparaison de sa très riche carrière administrative, politique et diplomatique, d’une part, et de nombreuses lacunes, d’autre part, ce fonds permet de retracer les activités du récipiendaire du prix Nobel de la paix de 1920 pendant ses vingt dernières années, à partir de 1906, alors au sommet de sa vie publique. Divisés en trois parties principales (les questions de droit international de 1906 à 1914, la Grande Guerre et la Société des Nations), les papiers Léon Bourgeois constituent un ensemble homogène par la même tension qui les parcourt d’un bout à l’autre : les efforts constants d’un homme qui cherche à établir la paix par l’établissement d’un droit international et de ses institutions. Il est donc proposé de parcourir la richesse de cette source de premier plan pour les questions d’histoire du droit international et de la Société des Nations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis→French-language works237,207→