Circula : revue d'idéologies linguistiques. Numéro 16, Varia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Riassunto: I paratesti (prefazioni, lettere dedicatorie e lettere agli spettatori) dei libretti d'opera, specialmente quella comica del Settecento, sono un veicolo di ideologie linguistiche.Spesso, infatti, librettisti, musicisti e imprenditori teatrali sentivano l'esigenza di giustificare le proprie scelte di lingua, stile e drammaturgia, per es.l'uso dell'italiano o del dialetto, il livello sociale dei personaggi, l'ambientazione ecc.Il presente articolo indaga un corpus di 69 libretti comici napoletani poco noti dal 1707 al 1750 e delinea le caratteristiche testuali proprie delle prefazioni operistiche.Dal dibattito linguistico delle prefazioni emerge una particolare sensibilità drammaturgica e metalinguistica degli autori di questi libretti, di cui finora si sono occupati, cursoriamente, soltanto i musicologi e gli storici del teatro ma quasi mai i linguisti.I paratesti delle commedie per musica sono insomma un osservatorio prezioso per capire la complessa «macchina performativa» del teatro in musica (Maione, 2015: 11), così come si stava perfezionando nella Napoli settecentesca.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.201 | 0.101 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".