Bibliographic record
Abstract
The listing of Phytophthora cinnamomi as a Key Threatening Process in NSW may have been a surprise to many who had come to believe that this pathogen was native, at least on the east coast.But how convincing was the argument that P. cinnamomi 1s native and, whatever its origins, how big a threat is it to native vegetation here?Patch death of Corymbia gummifera and Allocasuarina littoralis at Beecroft Peninsula (Jervis Bay).Most understorey shrubs have also died (especially Banskia ericifolia) and the site is now dominated by sedges.There has been extensive soll sampling in around the patch and P. cinnamomi can only be isolated from the area showing symptoms.Photograph: K. McDougall Pratt and Heather (1973) and Pratt et al. (1973) argued that P. cinnamomi was not introduced into eastern Australia following European settlement because: 1) 1t was so widespread; 2) it had been found in a remote, apparently undisturbed area; and 3) the native flora shows considerable resistance to disease symptoms suggesting a long association with the pathogen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".