Center-Focused Affinity Loss for Class Imbalance Histology Image Classification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Early-stage cancer diagnosis potentially improves the chances of survival for many cancer patients worldwide. Manual examination of Whole Slide Images (WSIs) is a time-consuming task for analyzing tumor-microenvironment. To overcome this limitation, the conjunction of deep learning with computational pathology has been proposed to assist pathologists in efficiently prognosing the cancerous spread. Nevertheless, the existing deep learning methods are ill-equipped to handle fine-grained histopathology datasets. This is because these models are constrained via conventional softmax loss function, which cannot expose them to learn distinct representational embeddings of the similarly textured WSIs containing an imbalanced data distribution. To address this problem, we propose a novel center-focused affinity loss (CFAL) function that exhibits 1) constructing uniformly distributed class prototypes in the feature space, 2) penalizing difficult samples, 3) minimizing intra-class variations, and 4) placing greater emphasis on learning minority class features. We evaluated the performance of the proposed CFAL loss function on two publicly available breast and colon cancer datasets having varying levels of imbalanced classes. The proposed CFAL function shows better discrimination abilities as compared to the popular loss functions such as ArcFace, CosFace, and Focal loss. Moreover, it outperforms several SOTA methods for histology image classification across both datasets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".