MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388966829 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi3268

Satellite mapping of red snow on North American glaciers

2023· article· en· W4388966829 on OpenAlexafffund
Casey B. Engstrom, Lynne M. Quarmby

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersSimon Fraser University
KeywordsSnowmeltMeltwaterGlacierSnowSatelliteEnvironmental scienceSnow fieldPhysical geographyAlbedo (alchemy)Snow coverClimatologyGeologyGeographyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Red snow caused by blooms of microalgae darkens the surface of summer snowfields, increasing snowmelt. To assess the contribution of red snow to supraglacial snowmelt in northwestern North America, we systematically mapped the 2019-2022 distribution of blooms by applying supervised classification to 6158 satellite images. Blooms occurred on 5% of the total glaciated area, heavily affecting many glaciers in years of prolonged snow cover duration. Individual glaciers had up to 65% of their surface area affected by bloom in one melt season, which we estimate caused as much as 3 cm of snow meltwater equivalent averaged across the glacier surface. These results demonstrate appreciable snowmelt caused by red snow albedo over vast areas of North American glaciers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207