MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388973444 · doi:10.1515/9780776627618-014

Fighting for Improvements to the Experience and Outcomes of Incarceration

2018· book-chapter· en· W4388973444 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Ottawa Press eBooks · 2018
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyCriminology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UnitedP risoners United is an organization created by and for prisoners in the Canadian federal penitentiary system.Our purpose is to explore the ways in which both the experience and the outcome of incarceration may be enhanced.This purpose is best achieved through disclosure and discussion of current conditions and practices within the Correctional Service Canada (CSC).Our primary focus is on rehabilitation, reintegration and the eff ectiveness of the CSC's eff orts to adhere to these mandates.The intent of our examinations and discussions is to assist CSC with improving the methodology for returning prisoners to society as law-abiding citizens, thus minimizing risk and enhancing public safety.Some of the initiatives we are currently working on are briefl y discussed below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Ottawa Press eBooksSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207