QUASARS – POINTERS TO AN INFINITE, ETERNAL AND DIALECTICAL UNIVERSE AND A REPUDIATION OF THE BIG BANG COSMOLOGY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quasars (quasi-stellar [star-like] radio sources) represent the critical criteria for choice between two opposite and widely different ontological and epistemological narrative of the universe. The first one, which is mainly based on mathematical idealism, views the universe as deterministic and an essentially unidirectional condensation of diffuse matter created through a single primordial explosion (The Big Bang) about 13.8 billion years ago. The second view, based on (limited) observational and empirical evidence asserts a rather intrinsic and dialectical evolution (appearance/disappearance) of matter and motion in this infinite, eternal and ever-changing universe; where new cosmic bodies are formed from ejected and/or dissipated newly created material; from the core of the existing cosmic bodies.; mediated by chance and necessity. Evidence and resource materials provided in this article clearly favours the dialectical narrative of the universe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.087 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.020 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".