Electromagnetic and Kinematic Mechanics Synchronized in Their Common Vector Field: A Mathematical Relation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this chapter is to establish the clear mathematical relations that exist between kinematic mechanics and electromagnetic mechanics, in accordance with Wilhelm Wien's project formulated in 1901. This harmonization was made possible by the inclusion in kinematic mechanics of Walter Kaufmann's measurements of the electron's mass increase as a function of its velocity, which H. A. Lorentz and all of the most cutting-edge physicists who examined his data confirmed; and the establishment of the electromagnetic structures and mutual interactions of the restricted set of stable elementary particles within the framework of the general theory of relativity. Description of the local trispatial vector complexes of the restricted set of stable elementary particles, of their stable combinations up to the atomic level and finally, of the four stable stationary resonance levels of the trispatial vector field. Analysis of the experimental confirmation of the magnetic nature of the electron spin; and establishment of its relation with the concept of magnetic monopole, of covalent molecular bounding, of the filling of electronic orbitals by electron pairs, of the generation of Cooper pairs, and of the related interpretation of the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".