MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388983263 · doi:10.12797/9788381388795.04

Powiat olkuski i nowe wyzwania po 24 lutego 2022 roku

2023· book-chapter· en· W4388983263 on OpenAlex
Monika Kwiatkowska, Dawid Berbeć

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishing eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean Politics and Security
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocal governmentLocal communityPublic administrationGovernment (linguistics)Political scienceFace (sociological concept)GeographySociologySocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the face of the humanitarian crisis after 24 February 2022, Olkusz County faced new challenges. Local authorities took instant decisions to organize aid for Ukraine. From 28 February to 10 March 2022, over 10,000 people came to Olkusz. The establishing of the “county tent city” used as a reception point was the main initiative undertaken by the local government. Numerous county-level institutions and local non-governmental organizations were involved in the aid initiatives. They were coordinating the collection of essential goods, organized their transports to Ukraine and participated in the aid operations of communities and organizations from Germany, the UK, Canada, the US, and France. The contribution of volunteers who worked in the “county tent city” and collection points was undoubtfully crucial and invaluable. The local community showed empathy engaging in bottom-up initiatives and those coordinated by county-level institutions and local non-governmental organizations. The authors of this article analyzed primary sources, including data received from the local government of Olkusz County, and secondary sources in the field of history and characteristics of the region. They also made a description of the previously conducted in-depth interview with the county office representatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Qualitativehigh
grokno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Qualitativehigh
opusno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Qualitativemedium
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it