MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4388997075 · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2023.109849

Reliability assessment of stochastic dynamical systems using physics informed neural network based PDEM

2023· article· en· W4388997075 on OpenAlexaff
Sourav Das, Solomon Tesfamariam

Bibliographic record

VenueReliability Engineering & System Safety · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProbability density functionApplied mathematicsArtificial neural networkMathematicsNonlinear systemGaussianPartial differential equationMathematical optimizationControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceMathematical analysisPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the recent decade, the reliability analysis of a stochastic system coupled with the uncertainty related to the system’s parameter has attracted much attention. Probability density evolution method (PDEM) is one of the viable options that estimates the probability density function of the structural response by solving generalized density evolution equations (GDEEs). The advantage of PDEM is that it is derived based on the principle of probability conservation, where GDEEs are decoupled from the physical system. In general, GDEEs in PDEM are solved using a finite difference scheme in which the accuracy of the numerical solution depends on the number of temporal and spatial discretizations , leading to computationally inefficient for high-fidelity models. With this in view, this study proposes a physics-informed neural network (PINN), a novel deep learning method, based PDEM, for solving the GDEEs. PINN utilizes physical information in the form of differential equations to enhance the performance of the neural networks. This method does not need any interpolation or coordinate transformation, which is often seen in any numerical scheme , thus the computational budget is reduced. Three numerical examples are presented in this study to illustrate the proposed PINN-based PDEM, including a Van-der-Pol oscillator subjected to Gaussian white noise, a one-storey moment resisting frame coupled with a nonlinear energy sink with negative stiffness and sliding friction , and a high-rise timber building coupled with shape memory alloy-based outriggers . The first example is utilized to show the accuracy of the proposed method by comparing results with the Fokker–Planck–Kolmogorov equation and Monte Carlo simulation . The rest two examples are investigated for estimating time-dependent probability of failure. Numerical results show that the proposed PINN-based PDEM can estimate the probability of failure efficiently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations57
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReliability Engineering & System SafetySame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207