MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Activation of dynamin‐related protein 1 contributes to conversion of cardiomyocytes into a proinflammatory phenotype in rat model of sepsis

2016· article· en· W4389008579 on OpenAlexaff
Weipeng Jiang, Aibin Tao, Tina Mele, Raymond Kao, Claudio M. Martin, Tao Rui

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMitochondrial Function and Pathology
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityLawson Health Research Institute
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsProinflammatory cytokineSepsisMyocyteChemokinePhenotypeInflammationChemistryImmunologyCell biologyPharmacologyMedicineBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamin‐related protein 1 (Drp1) is a regulator of mitochondrial fission and cell death pathways. The aim of this study is to determine whether Drp1 plays a role in conversion of cardiomyocytes into a proinflammatory phenotype in sepsis. Methods In vivo: rat model of sepsis was induced by intraperitoneally injection of fecal materials and myocardial MPO activity and PMN accumulation were assessed. In vitro: cultured rat cardiomyocytes were challenged with plasma (20%) of septic rats. Myocyte Drp1 activation (Western) and chemokine production (LIX and KC) were determined (RT‐PCR and ELISA). Results Six hours after induction of sepsis, PMN infiltration of the myocardial interstitium was evident in the septic rats. This inflammatory response was ameliorated by a Drp1 inhibitor, Mdivi‐1. Challenge of cultured rat cardiomyocytes with septic plasma resulted in Drp1 activation and converted the cardiomyocytes to a proinflammatory phenotype (the myocytes produced and secreted the chemokines, LIX and KC); effects blunted by Mdivi‐1. Conclusion The results indicate that Drp1 plays an important role in conversion of cardiomyocytes into a proinflammatory phenotype. The Drp1 could be an effective target for treatment of sepsis. (*Corresponding author) Support or Funding Information IRF of Lawson Health Research Institute (IRF 2014‐25); National Natural Science Foundation of China (81370333); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK2015‐1332)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMitochondrial Function and Pathology→French-language works237,207→