MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Two Weeks of Reduced Steps Disrupts Integrated Rates of Muscle Protein Synthesis and Glycemic Control in Healthy Older Adults

2017· article· en· W4389017001 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Chris McGlory, Tanner Stokes, Mark von Allmen, Robert W. Morton, Brennan K. Smith, Gregory R. Steinberg, Stuart M. Phillips

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMuscle metabolism and nutrition
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Diabetes Association
KeywordsGlycemicInternal medicineEndocrinologyMyofibrilLean body massSkeletal musclePhosphorylationMedicineSarcopeniaInsulin resistanceChemistryInsulinBody weightBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transient periods of physical inactivity can result in losses of skeletal muscle mass and reductions in insulin sensitivity. These metabolic impairments may not be fully recovered, particularly in older individuals. 1 We aimed to examine the impact of two weeks of reduced steps followed by two weeks of recovery, on lean body mass (LBM), integrated rates of myofibrillar protein synthesis (MPS), single fiber cross‐sectional area ( f CSA), and indices of glycemic control (HOMA‐IR and MATSUDA) in response to an oral glucose tolerance test. We also examined changes in oxidative phosphorylation protein complex content, phosphorylation of other related signaling molecules, and concentration of circulating inflammatory markers. Twenty‐two healthy older adults (12 men, 10 women, 69±4yr [all data mean±SD]) underwent 7d of monitored normal activity at baseline (BL) before reducing their daily step‐count from 7362±3294 to 990±97 steps . d −1 for 14d (SR). Habitual step count was then recovered for a period of 14d (RC). Integrated rates of muscle protein synthesis (MPS) were reduced from BL at SR (BL 1.51±0.07 to SR 1.33±0.05 % . d −1 , p<0.05) and were not restored at RC (1.34±0.14 % . d −1 ). Women displayed significantly greater rates of integrated MPS at BL compared to men (1.56±0.06 vs. 1.47±0.04 % . d −1 , p<0.05). HOMA‐IR increased from BL to SR (2.6±0.4 to 3.8±0.9, p<0.05) and MATSUDA decreased (3.9±0.7 to 2.9±0.4, p<0.05), neither recovered at RC. Glucose AUC was significantly elevated from BL at SR (368±137 to 442±142, p<0.05) and was not fully recovered from SR at RC (393±15). Insulin AUC increased from BL to SR (3372±889 to 3972±1008, p<0.05) and was still elevated at RC (3865±716). Circulating plasma TNF‐a was significantly increased from BL at SR (11.78±2.84 to 15.41±4.64 pg . mL −1 , p<0.05) and was still elevated above BL at RC (14.28±3.76 pg . mL −1 ). Plasma IL‐6 concentration was also significantly increased from BL at SR (8.33±3.06 to 10.84± 4.35 pg . mL −1 , p<0.05) and remained elevated at RC (9.99±4.37 pg . mL −1 ). There was no detectable impact of step reduction on LBM, f CSA, fiber type distribution, or the content of oxidative phosphorylation protein complexes at any time point. Additionally, step reduction failed to impact the phosphorylation status of ACC Ser212 , Akt Ser473 , mTOR Ser2448 , Ulk1 Ser757 , and Ulk1 Ser55 at BL, SR, and RC. These data demonstrate that two weeks of step reduction leads to lowered rates of MPS that are accompanied by appearance of a diabetic phenotype, and markers of an inflammatory state, which are not recovered on return to a normal daily step count in healthy older adults. Ultimately, proactive interventions such as exercise or pharmaceuticals may be required to reverse decrements in metabolic health with transient periods of physical inactivity in this population. Support or Funding Information Supported by the Canadian Diabetes Association

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicMuscle metabolism and nutrition→French-language works237,207→