MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Multiprotein complexes regulating excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain

2017· article· en· W4389017248 on OpenAlexafffund
Vivek Mahadevan, Melanie A. Woodin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsNeuroscienceNeurotransmissionInhibitory postsynaptic potentialExcitatory postsynaptic potentialBiologySynapseGlutamate receptorReceptorBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is now firmly established that imbalances between neuronal excitation (E) and inhibition (I) commonly manifest in neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders 1,2 . However, the precise molecular machinery that underlies E:I balance regulation in neurons is poorly understood. KCC2 is the only neuron‐specific K + Cl − cotransporter that extrudes Cl‐from mature neurons, enabling them to maintain a low intracellular [Cl − ], essential for fast inhibitory neurotransmission 3,4 . Additionally, KCC2 plays important roles in excitatory neurotransmission by regulating dendritic spine morphogenesis 3 . KCC2 dysfunction contributes to human neurological disorders including, epilepsy, neuropathic pain and multiple neuropsychiatric disorders 5–10 . Since KCC2 is at the crux of both synaptic excitation and inhibition and is implicated in neurological disorders, it is imperative to identify the full‐range of KCC2 binding partners to have a firm grasp of its biology. First, using a candidate approach, we made a surprising discovery that native KCC2 exists in a physical and functional complex with native‐ionotropic glutamate receptor (iGluR) subunit GluK2 11 , and its auxiliary subunit Neto2 12,13 in hippocampal neurons; and that they regulate KCC2‐mediated neuronal Cl − homeostasis. In the present abstract, we reveal that native KCC2 coexists with several members of recycling machinery at the post synapse that have been established to regulate iGluR recycling and surface expression; and also regulate KCC2 cell biology and function. Overall, we identify the existence of members of synaptic inhibition and synaptic excitation within the same macromolecular complex, creating a framework for (i) understanding the fundamental nexus between cell‐intrinsic synaptic excitation and inhibition, and (ii) provide novel therapeutic strategies to rescue KCC2 deficits that occur in E:I imbalance disorders of the nervous system. Support or Funding Information CIHR

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research→French-language works237,207→