MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hypoxia stimulates an increase of Neuropeptide Y Y1 and Y5 receptor expression in human breast cancer cells

2017· article· en· W4389018555 on OpenAlexaffabout
Philip J. Medeiros, James Uniacke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuropeptide Y receptorBiologyReceptorHypoxia (environmental)Messenger RNAWestern blotEndocrinologyInternal medicineCancer researchCancer cellCancerNeuropeptideChemistryMedicineGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hypoxic microenvironment is a common physiological attribute in solid tumors. Low O 2 in tumors promotes a malignant phenotype, associated with increased proliferative, angiogenic and metastatic potential. Accumulating evidence suggests that neuroendocrine factors and their corresponding receptors may contribute to the initiation, development and progression of various cancers. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) and its receptors have been implicated as such a factor in the progression of breast cancer. Previous studies have reported the expression of the Y1R and Y5R receptor subtypes in human breast cancer cells and tumors. We have demonstrated that in breast cancer cells, NPY stimulation of Y5R increased proliferation and migration, and induced the release of vascular endothelial growth factor. In the current study, we examined the effects of O 2 concentration on NPY receptor expression in MCF‐7 and MDA‐MB‐231 cells. Using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and Western blot, we compared Y1R and Y5R mRNA and protein expression in cells exposed to 1% (hypoxia) and 21% (normoxia) O 2 . Y1R and Y5R mRNA was quantified after 1h, 3h, 6h, 12h and 24h of hypoxia. Relative to normoxic cells, we observed a significant increase in Y1R and Y5R mRNA after 3h's of hypoxia in both cell lines. Protein expression of Y1R and Y5R was examined after a 24h hypoxic exposure. Y1R increased 2‐fold (MDA‐MB231) compared to normoixa. Y5R expression increased 79% (MCF‐7) and 55% (MDA‐MB231) relative to normoxic cells. Previous work from our group has demonstrated that hypoxic cancer cells require eukaryotic initiation factor 4E2 (eIF4E2) to direct the cap‐dependent translation of select mRNAs, therefore we tested whether the hypoxia‐induced increases in Y1R and Y5R expression were dependent on eIF4E2. Using MDA‐MB 231 cells depleted of eIF4E2, we found that hypoxic treatment had no effect on Y1R and Y5R expression compared to normoxic cells. These data provide insight into the O 2 ‐mediated regulation of NPY receptors in breast cancer. Taken together with our previous functional NPY receptor studies, our findings provide further evidence of pathological implications of the NPY system in breast cancer. Ongoing studies will further elucidate the transcriptional and translational regulation of NPY receptors in response to hypoxia. Support or Funding Information Supported by Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation and Cancer Research Society

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseFrench-language works237,207