MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 treatment stimulates <i>Neurogenin3</i> expression and pancreatic beta‐cell neogenesis in adult mice

2017· article· en· W4389018709 on OpenAlexaff
Nidheesh Dadheech, Jean Buteau

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeogenesisEndocrinologyInternal medicineGlucagonPancreasBiologyBeta cellCellular differentiationStreptozotocinProgenitor cellCell biologyStem cellInsulinIsletDiabetes mellitusMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glucagon‐Like Peptide 1 (GLP‐1) is an intestinal hormone secreted after a meal. GLP‐1 is considered a key molecule in diabetes treatment because (a) it acts as a growth factor to promote beta‐cell mass expansion and (b) increases insulin secretion. Whereas GLP‐1 action on beta‐cell proliferation and survival has been extensively studied, its potential action on beta‐cell differentiation remains elusive. We herein performed lineage tracing experiments in genetically engineered mice to test the hypothesis that GLP‐1 stimulates the formation of new mature beta‐cells (neogenesis) in the adult pancreas. We used mice expressing a tamoxifen‐inducible Cre‐recombinase under the Neurog3 promoter to permanently label differentiating beta‐cells with a ZsGreen marker. This is because Neurog3 is transiently expressed in progenitor cells undergoing differentiation and is otherwise absent in the adult pancreas. Neurog3‐CreER/Rosa26‐LSL‐ZsGreen mice were injected with a moderate dose of streptozotocin to induce low levels of beta‐cell damage and regeneration. Then, mice were treated daily with tamoxifen alone or in combination with the long‐acting GLP‐1 analog Exendin4 (Ex‐4). Pancreata were harvested after 2 or 7 days of treatment. Control pancreata were devoid of ZsGreen staining, consistent with the fact that beta‐cell differentiation does not occur spontaneously in adult mice. Animals treated with Ex‐4, showed high frequency of ZsGreen+ cells in pancreatic islets and ducts, indicating that Ex‐4 induces Neurog3 expression in the adult pancreas. Mice treated with Ex‐4 for 2 days displayed small clusters of ZsGreen+ cells that were polyhormonal, a feature of immature/differentiating pancreatic endocrine cells. After 7 days of treatment, we detected a high number of insulin/ZsGreen dual positive cells, demonstrating that Ex‐4 stimulates the formation of new mature beta‐cells. We characterized the lineage of ZsGreen+ cells by studying the expression of various progenitor cell markers. Finally, we sorted ZsGreen+ cells to define their expression profile and confirm that newly‐differentiated beta‐cells could secrete insulin in response to physiological concentrations of glucose. Our study shows that GLP‐1, a naturally occurring hormone and an important anti‐diabetes therapeutic target, stimulates beta‐cell neogenesis. We thereby unveiled a new mode of action for the incretin hormone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→