MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fractionated Dairy Cow Milk β‐Casein Modulates Jejunal Alkaline Phosphatase Activity Kinetics in Neonatal Piglets Liquid Formulas

2017· article· en· W4389019665 on OpenAlexaffabout
N. Burello, Niloufar Rafiee Tari, Kelu Zhou, Tania Archbold, Milena Corredig, Ming Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCaseinAlkaline phosphataseChemistryDigestion (alchemy)ColostrumGastrointestinal tractFood sciencePhosphateEnzymeBiochemistryBiologyAnimal scienceImmunologyChromatographyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bioactive peptides originating from β‐casein have been shown to be resistant to enzymatic digestion in the gastrointestinal tract and to induce immunological responses. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP) is a critical anti‐inflammatory mediator, because it possesses the ability to catalyze the hydrolytic dephosphorylation of endotoxin lipopolysaccharides (LPS), the key ligands to toll‐like receptors (e.g., TLR4), and other emblematic members of pathogen‐associated‐molecular patterns (PAMPs) such as ATP, thus preventing gut dysbiosis and disorders. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that immunomodulatory activities possessed by β‐casein would be secondary and mediated through β‐casein modulating IAP functionality. Three formulas were formulated with a control formula containing whey protein as the sole source of protein, and two testing formulas containing total casein to whey protein ratio (%) of 40:60, but differing in β‐casein at 3.51 and 4.36% (on air‐dry basis), respectively; and contents of all other dietary nutrients including metabolizable energy, total crude protein, minerals and vitamins were formulated to be equal among the three formulas. A total of 24 colostrum‐suckled 3‐day‐old piglets were randomly assigned to each formula, housed individually in metabolic crates, and fed their assigned formulas for 18 days according to a randomized block design. At the end of the study, piglets were euthanized and the proximal jejunal tissue samples were taken. The IAP kinetic experiments were conducted with the homogenized porcine jejunal samples (about 25 μg protein each incubation) and 16 gradient concentrations of P ‐nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP), ranging 0 – 6 mM in incubation media at pH 7.4 and 37 °C. The kinetics (parameter estimates ± SE, P < 0.05) of the jejunal IAP activities of hydrolyzing pNPP were obtained, including V max values (umol/mg protein·min, n = 64) of 0.067 ± 0.003, 0.071 ± 0.004, and 0.068 ± 0.004; and K m values (mM, n = 64) of 0.186 ± 0.037, 0.129 ± 0.035, and 0.474 ± 0.087 in the control, the 3.51%‐ β‐casein, and the 4.36% ‐β‐casein formulas, respectively. Pooled t‐test showed that the jejunal V max was higher ( P < 0.05) in the 3.51%‐ beta‐casein group than in the control and the 4.36 %‐beta‐casein groups by about 4–6% while the jejunal V max values were not different ( P > 0.05) between the control and the 4.36%–beta‐casein groups. Whereas the K m value was lower ( P < 0.05) in the 3.51%–β‐casein group than in the control and the 4.36%‐β‐casein groups by 44% and 2.7‐fold, respectively while the K m value was lower ( P < 0.05) in the control than in the 4.36%–beta‐casein group by 1.6‐fold. Our results show that dietary β‐casein affects the jejunal IAP functionality especially the jejunal IAP enzyme affinity in a dose‐dependent manner, thus indirectly inducing secondary gut local and systemic immunological responses in the neonate. Support or Funding Information NSERC Discovery Program of Canada and Metagen Enzyme Corporation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicInfant Nutrition and Health→French-language works237,207→