MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Identification of Dietary Patterns Associated with Chronic Disease Risk Using Hybrid Dimension Reduction Techniques: Evidence from the Canadian National Nutrition Survey

2017· article· en· W4389021863 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mahsa Jessri, Russell D. Wolfinger, Wendy Lou, Mary R. L’Abbé

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutritional Studies and Diet
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMedicineObesityLogistic regressionEnvironmental healthDiseaseNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyChronic diseasePopulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analysing dietary patterns is an important approach for characterizing the complex relationships between foods and nutrients in etiology of obesity and other chronic diseases. Several studies have used a priori and data‐driven dimension reduction techniques for evaluating dietary patterns in relation to chronic disease risks, even though methods for applying these techniques to complex nationally‐representative nutrition surveys are not yet developed. The objective of this study was to define a novel algorithm for using hybrid dimension reduction techniques for identifying dietary patterns of Canadians most strongly associated with obesity and other chronic diseases (diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases) at the national population level. Dietary data were collected using 24‐hour dietary recalls (second recall in sub‐sample). All analyses included 11,748 participants (≥18 y) in the cross‐sectional nationally‐representative Canadian Community Health Survey 2.2 (2004/5). To ensure nationally‐representative estimates, weighting algorithm was incorporated into the partial least squares analyses (PLS), to derive an energy‐dense (ED), high‐fat (HF) and low fiber density (LFD) dietary pattern using 38 food groups. PLS is the most flexible hybrid technique for deriving dietary patterns enabling discovery of important disease‐specific dietary exposures that have not been previously identified in etiology of chronic diseases. The association of dietary patterns with obesity and chronic diseases was ascertained using weighted multinominal logistic regression‐GLM adjusted for the following covariates in successive models: age, sex, dietary misreporting, energy intakes, physical activity and smoking. Using the weighted PLS algorithm, an ED,HF,LFD dietary pattern was derived with high positive loadings for fast foods, carbonated drinks, refined grains and negative loadings for whole fruits, and vegetables (≥|0.17|). Food groups with a “high” loading were summed to form a simplified dietary pattern score. Moving from the first (healthiest) to the fourth (least healthy) quartiles of the ED,HF,LFD and the simplified dietary pattern scores was associated with increasingly elevated odds ratios (OR) for “obesity with at least one chronic disease” (diabetes, cancer and cardiovascular diseases), with individuals in quartile 4 having an OR of 2.57 (95%CI:1.75,3.76) and 2.73 (1.88,3.98), respectively (p‐trend<0.0001). The associations of dietary patterns with “healthy obesity” (obesity without having a chronic disease) and “being non‐obese with at least one chronic disease” were weaker, albeit significant (p<0.05). Overall, consuming an ED,HF,LFD dietary pattern was associated with significantly higher risk of obesity with and without accompanying chronic diseases. Our findings demonstrated that novel techniques for deriving dietary patterns can be modified for successful use in nationally‐representative surveys. The weighted algorithm we defined in this research can be used for deriving dietary patterns associated with chronic diseases at the national population level, improving the applicability and use of novel dietary pattern techniques by governments and researchers. Support or Funding Information This research was supported by a grant from the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Innovation in Regulatory Science Award, and funds to the Canadian Research Data Centre Network (CRDCN) from the Social Science and Humanities research Council (SSHRC), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Canadian Foundation for Innovation (CFI) and Statistics Canada. M.J. was funded by a Burroughs Wellcome Fund Fellowship, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship, the CIHR/Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Population Intervention for Chronic Disease Prevention (PICDP): A Pan‐Canadian Fellowship, Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS) and the Faculty of Medicine Hunter Fellowship (University of Toronto). M.L. is the Earle W. McHenry professor and is supported through chair endowed unrestricted research funds, University of Toronto. Funders had no role in the design, analysis or writing of this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNutritional Studies and Diet→French-language works237,207→