MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Administration of Prostacyclin Mediates Cutaneous Vasodilation but not Sweating in Young and Older Females: Roles for Nitric oxide and KCa channels

2017· article· en· W4389022567 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Naoto Fujii, Brendan D. McNeely, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProstacyclinVasodilationMedicineNitric oxideInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our recent report indicated that although prostacyclin does not mediate sweating in young and older males, it does modulate cutaneous vasodilation in both groups to a similar extent (Fujii et al. J Physiol 594 (21), 6419–6429, 2016). The same study also suggested that nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and calcium‐activated potassium (K Ca ) channels contribute to the prostacyclin‐induced cutaneous vasodilation in young males but, these contributions are diminished in older males. In our current study, we sought to evaluate whether the same responses are observed in young and older females. In young (25±4 years) and older (60±6 years) females (10 per group), cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) and sweat rate were evaluated at four intradermal forearm skin sites: 1) Control, 2) 10 mM L‐NNA, a non‐specific NOS inhibitor, 3) 50 mM tetraethylammonium (TEA), a non‐specific K Ca channel blocker, and 4) 10 mM L‐NNA + 50 mM TEA. All fours sites were co‐administered with prostacyclin in an incremental manner (0.04, 0.4, 4, 40, 400 μM each for 25 min). Our results demonstrated that both NOS and/or K Ca channels contribute to prostacyclin‐induced cutaneous vasodilation for young and older females. This is based on our observations that the increased CVC due to prostacyclin administration was attenuated by TEA (0.4 μM) and a combination of L‐NNA and TEA (at all concentrations tested) in young females. Additionally, in older females the increased CVC due to prostacyclin administration was also reduced by separate administration of either L‐NNA or TEA (0.04–4 μM), and a combination of both agents (0.04–40 μM) (all P ≤0.05). Surprisingly, increases in CVC in response to 0.04–4 μM prostacyclin were greater in older relative to young females (all P ≤0.05), and these age‐related differences were diminished when both L‐NNA and TEA were simultaneously administered (all P >0.05). No effect on sweat rate was observed in either group (all concentrations, P >0.05). We conclude that while prostacyclin does not mediate sweating, it modulates cutaneous vasodilation to a greater extent in older relative to young females. Wherein, this modulation is likely due to NOS‐ and KCa channel‐dependent mechanisms. Support or Funding Information This study was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery grant, RGPIN‐06313‐2014; Discovery Grants Program ‐ Accelerator Supplement, RGPAS‐462252‐2014). Funds held by Dr. Glen P. Kenny.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207