MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fetal Brain Gene Expression Is More Responsive to Maternal Intestinal Nematode Infection than to Maternal Protein Deficiency

2017· article· en· W4389022920 on OpenAlexaffabout
Manjurul Haque, Kristine G. Koski, Marilyn E. Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyGeneFetusGene expressionFold changeNematode infectionImmune systemSignal peptidePregnancyAndrologyImmunologyMolecular biologyNematodeGeneticsPeptide sequenceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Maternal dietary protein deficiency and nematode infection during early pregnancy have negative impacts on both maternal placental gene expression and fetal growth in the mouse. Here we used next generation RNA sequencing to test our hypothesis that maternal protein deficiency and/or nematode infection alter the expression of genes in the developing fetal brain. Methods Outbred pregnant CD1 mice were used in a 2×2 design with two levels of dietary protein (sufficient [24%] and deficient [6%]) and two levels of infection (sham and Heligmosomoides bakeri). Pregnant dams were euthanized on gestation day 18 to harvest the whole fetal brain. Four fetal brain samples from each treatment group (protein sufficient uninfected, protein sufficient infected, protein deficient uninfected and protein deficient infected) were analyzed using RNA Hiseq sequencing. The raw RNA‐seq FASTQ files were aligned to the reference genome to get BAM files and HTSeq was used to count the number of expressed transcripts. Differential expression of genes was determined by edge R package (P < 0.05 and 1.5 fold change) using Network Analyst. Results In response to maternal H. bakeri infection, a total of 96 genes (88 up‐regulated and 8 down‐regulated) were differentially expressed in the fetal brain. Differentially expressed genes were involved in metabolic processes, developmental processes and immune system according to PANTHER classification system. Gene ontology analysis in DAVID revealed more than 15 hits for seven GO terms: secreted, signal, extracellular region, disulphide bond, signal peptide, glycoprotein and glycosolation. Enrichment scores > 20 were found for ten GO terms: heterodimer, MHC II, Ca‐binding region 2, Ca‐binding region 1, prophase, meitotic prophase, S‐100 protein, surface antigen, synapsis, and chromosome organization involved in meiosis. Among the important biological functions identified, several up‐regulated genes have known neurological functions including neurodevelopment (GDF15, Ing4), neural differentiation (miRNA let‐7), synaptic plasticity (via NF‐κβ), neuro‐inflammatory and neuro‐degenerative diseases (S100A8 & S100A9) and glucose metabolism (Tnnt1 & Atf3). In response to maternal protein deficiency, brain specific serine protease (Prss22) was the only up‐regulated gene and no gene was down‐regulated in fetal brain. Only two genes (Troponin T1 and Dynlt1a dynein light chain) responded to the interaction of maternal nematode infection and PD, and their expression was reduced. The differential expressions of genes were confirmed by qPCR. Conclusion The study shows that exposure to maternal GI nematode infection from day 5 to 18 of pregnancy altered the fetal brain gene expression profile particularly genes related to neural development and energy metabolism. Infection may play an important and under recognized role in intrauterine development and developmental programming of the fetal brain. Support or Funding Information Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicInfant Nutrition and Health→French-language works237,207→