MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Dairy Consumption is Associated with Body Composition, Physical Function and Frailty in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults: The Quebec NuAge Longitudinal Study

2017· article· en· W4389022981 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Samaneh Farsijani, Hélène Payette, José A. Morais, Bryna Shatenstein, Pierrette Gaudreau, Stéphanie Chevalier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversité de SherbrookeMcGill University
FundersDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsMedicineLongitudinal studyComposition (language)Dairy foodsConsumption (sociology)Food groupSarcopeniaLean body massGerontologyEnvironmental healthAnimal scienceFood scienceBody weightEndocrinologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Despite the potential contribution of dietary factors to healthy aging, the role of dairy products, as part of the diet, on body composition and physical performance in free‐living older adults has been scarcely studied in longitudinal studies. Objectives Our primary aim was to investigate the association between total dairy intake and body composition and physical performance of older adults from the NuAge longitudinal study on Nutrition and Aging. Our secondary objective was to examine the association between dairy intake and frailty at baseline (T0). Design Participants (n=1499; aged 67–84y,) were assessed for total dairy consumption (servings/d) (milk, cheese, yogurt and dairy‐based desserts) by 6 nonconsecutive 24‐h food recalls collected over 2 years. Body composition was measured by DXA in a subgroup of subjects (54%) at T0 and after 2‐y (T2). Functional composite scores were calculated for muscle strength (handgrip, arm and leg) and mobility (timed up‐&‐go, chair stand, normal and fast walking speed), measured at T0 and annually thereafter for 3 y. Frailty was defined according to Fried et al. 2001 criteria. Mixed‐model analysis was performed to assess trajectories of body composition and function across time per sex, as conditioned by total dairy intake, adjusted for potential covariates. Results Consumption of total and individual dairy products was similar in both sexes, except for high‐fat dairy products and yogurt which were consumed more by men and women, respectively. Higher dairy consumption was independently associated with a higher lean mass (LM) and mobility scores in both sexes, and a better strength score only in men throughout the follow‐up. Interestingly, total dairy intake was inversely associated with fat mass (FM) in women whereas the association was positive in men. Longitudinal declines in LM and functional scores were not associated with dairy consumption. In men, but not in women, the risk of pre‐frailty/frailty was less among high (≥2 servings/d) versus low (<0.6 servings/d) dairy consumers (odds ratio= 0.52; 95% CI=0.30–0.92). Conclusions Our results indicate that greater dairy consumption is associated with better body composition and function, i.e., two major predictors of frailty in aging. However, further research is required to explore the long‐term benefits of dairy product consumption and its potential causative association with healthy aging. Support or Funding Information Dairy Farmers of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicNutrition and Health in Aging→French-language works237,207→