MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Early Weight Gain, Linear Growth, and Mid‐childhood Blood Pressure

2016· article· en· W4389024004 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Perng, Sheryl L. Rifas‐Shiman, Michael S. Kramer, Line Klingen Haugaard, Emily Oken, Matthew W. Gillman, Mandy B. Belfort

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPercentileMedicineGestational ageBody mass indexBirth weightBlood pressureWeight gainSmall for gestational ageCohortObstetricsStandard scorePregnancyPediatricsDemographyInternal medicineBody weightMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate relations of change in body mass index (BMI) and length/height during 4 early life age intervals (birth to 6mo, 6mo to 1y, 1 to 2y, and 2 to 3y) with mid‐childhood systolic blood pressure (SBP), and to evaluate for effect modification by birth size (birthweight‐for‐gestational age z‐score). Methods We studied 957 participants in Project Viva, an ongoing U.S. pre‐birth cohort. Using multivariable linear regression, we examined the associations of weight gain (change in body mass index [BMI] z‐score) change and linear growth (change in length/height z‐score) during each time period with mid‐childhood SBP, adjusting for maternal education, age, pre‐pregnancy BMI, and smoking; and child's age, sex, race/ethnicity, continuous birthweight‐for‐gestational age z‐score, and growth in preceding periods. We examined interaction of these growth measures with birth size according to small (<10 th percentile of sex‐ and gestational‐age specific birthweight), appropriate (10 th to <90 th percentile), and large‐for‐gestational age (≥90 th percentile). Results Children were 7.9 ± 0.8 years at time of SBP assessment; 50.3% were girls and most were white (65%). Mean ± SD SBP was 94.4 ± 8.8 mmHg and DBP was 54.3 ± 5.7 mmHg. Each additional z‐score gain in BMI from birth to 6mo and 2 to 3y was associated with 0.81 (95% CI: 0.15, 1.46) and 1.61 (0.33, 2.89) mmHg higher systolic SBP, respectively. Gain in length from 1 to 2y was related to higher SBP among boys (2.24 [0.89, 3.60] mmHg per z‐score) but not girls (−0.18 [−1.60, 1.25] mmHg per z‐score). There was no evidence of effect modification by birth size. Conclusions Faster gain in BMI during the first 6 postnatal months and in the preschool years may lead to higher SBP in mid‐childhood, regardless of size at birth. Strategies to reduce accrual of excess adiposity during early life may bring long‐term benefits for cardiovascular health Support or Funding Information This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (K24 HD069408, R37 HD 034568, P30 DK092924).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→