MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hydrogen Sulfide Decreases Blood Pressure by Influencing the Excitability of Area Postrema Neurons

2017· article· en· W4389024178 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Pauline Smith, Alastair V. Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Sedative Agents
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsArea postremaSubfornical organMicroinjectionChemistryElectrophysiologySodium hydrosulfideCircumventricular organsInternal medicineEndocrinologyDepolarizationCentral nervous systemAnesthesiaMedicineNeuroscienceBlood pressureHydrogen sulfideAngiotensin IIBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S), an endogenous gaseous transmitter, has been shown to act in the central nervous system (CNS) to influence cardiovascular (CV) function. Microinjection of H 2 S into central autonomic control centers such as the paraventricular nucleus and subfornical organ has been shown to increase blood pressure (BP) and electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that H 2 S depolarizes neurons in these same regions. Depolarizing effects of H 2 S have also been demonstrated in the nucleus tractus solitarius, a medullary autonomic control center with reciprocal connections to the immediately adjacent area postrema (AP). The AP is a circumventricular organ (CVO) with well documented roles in cardiovascular regulation. The present study was undertaken to examine the cardiovascular effects of microinjection of the H 2 S donor, sodium hydrogen sulfide (NaHS), into the AP of urethane anesthetized male Sprague Dawley rats and the cellular consequences of bath application of NaHS on the excitability of dissociated AP neurons. Microinjection (0.5 μl) of NaHS (10 μM) caused rapid, short duration (<90 sec) decreases in BP (mean area under the curve (AUC) =−389.2 ± 82.6 mmHg*sec, n=6) and HR (mean AUC = −6.6 ± 1.4 beats, n=6) while whole cell perforated patch electrophysiology revealed that bath application of NaHS (1mM) elicited solely hyperpolarizing responses (mean Δ in membrane potential = −3.6 ± 0.8 mV, n=8) in the majority (n=8/13) of AP neurons tested. These observations identify the AP as a CNS location at which H 2 S may act to influence cardiovascular regulation. Support or Funding Information Supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsFrench-language works237,207