MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cardio‐respiratory Development in Juvenile Sprague‐Dawley Rats: a Histomorphologic and Immunohistochemical Study

2016· article· en· W4389025761 on OpenAlexafffund
Vanessa Vrolyk, Ancuta Apreutese, Cedric Gordon, Roy Forster, Andrew Graham, Bernard Palate, Julius Haruna, Marie‐Odile Benoit‐Biancamano

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
FundersMitacs
KeywordsH&E stainImmunohistochemistryMasson's trichrome stainPathologyLungTrichromeTrichrome stainVan Gieson's stainElastinVimentinMedicineStainingBiologyAnatomyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Juvenile toxicity studies have become an important and crucial focus of the preclinical drug industry. To accurately distinguish the potential detrimental effects of new drugs on the cardio‐respiratory system, it is essential to thoroughly define the normal tissue remodeling features characterizing the development and maturation of this system. The purpose of this study was to investigate the key histomorphological postnatal changes of the cardio‐respiratory system in Sprague‐Dawley rats from birth to postnatal day (PnD) 30, with a special focus on cell proliferation and apoptosis. Formalin‐fixed and paraffin‐embedded lung, trachea, heart and aorta were obtained from 51 Sprague Dawley rats divided in 13 timepoints according to age (PnD1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 17, 21, 24, 26, 28, and 30). Whenever possible, equal numbers of females and males were used in each group. Sections were cut at 4mm thickness and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. In addition, immunohistochemical demonstration of vimentin within lung samples and distinction between collagen and elastin fibers within the aortic wall with Masson's trichrome stain was performed. When relevant, immunohistochemistry staining was performed to highlight apoptosis (caspase‐3) and cell proliferation (Ki‐67). The ratio of heart weight relative to body weight was calculated for each timepoint and was higher at birth, then progressively decreased until PnD30. The rat heart was morphologically immature at birth and developed by cell hyperplasia over the perinatal period followed by cell hypertrophy around the third postnatal week. The newborn myocardium was hypercellular with less prominent cross‐striations, and mitotic figures and apoptotic bodies were frequently seen. The aortic wall progressively increased in thickness throughout the duration of the study as a result of an accumulation of extracellular matrix (collagen and elastic fibers). At birth, the trachea was lined by immature columnar ciliated epithelial cells, and submucosal glands became visible around one week after birth. The newborn rat had no alveoli but instead possessed large gas exchange units termed “primary saccules” characterized by highly cellular walls with a central sheet of connective tissue flanked on both sides by flattened cells (primary septa). An intense interstitial cellular proliferation was observed in the lungs between PND6 and PND14 resulting in new secondary septa, which were highly vimentin immunopositive. By the end of the third postnatal week, the septa underwent noticeable thinning and the lung parenchyma progressively matured, resulting in increased gas exchange surfaces. The findings described herein suggest that the cardio‐respiratory system of rats is immature at birth. The lungs and airways reached maturity 3 weeks after birth while cardiomyocyte hypertrophy was noticed until PnD30. The data generated will serve as background historical database that will be valuable when performing postnatal developmental toxicity studies. Support or Funding Information Mitacs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207