MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Time Course of Structural and Functional Adaptations of Mesenteric Resistance Vasculature after High Thoracic Spinal Cord Injury

2016· article· en· W4389025999 on OpenAlexaffabout
David Popok, Christopher R. West, B. Frias, Ismail Laher, Andrei V. Krassioukov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreVancouver Coastal HealthInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAutonomic dysreflexiaSplanchnicSpinal cord injuryBlood pressurePhenylephrineMyographMesenteric arteriesVascular resistanceAnesthesiaArterial stiffnessMethoxamineInternal medicineCardiologyVasodilationHemodynamicsEndocrinologySpinal cordArteryAgonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts autonomic pathways and consequently perturbs cardiovascular homeostasis. Injuries above T6 results in loss of descending sympathetic control of the splanchnic vasculature. Blood pressure regulation is impaired resulting in resting hypotension and episodic hypertension, the latter of which is known as a life threatening condition called autonomic dysreflexia (AD). These fluctuations in arterial blood pressure following SCI may also result in dysfunction and maladaptive remodelling at the level of the splanchnic resistance vasculature. Objective To examine the time course of structural and functional adaptations of resistance mesenteric vasculature in a complete T3 transection rodent model. Design/Method 15 male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to three groups: T3 SCI 1 Week (n=5), T3 SCI 1 Month (n=5), and Uninjured Control (n=5). Functional and structural assessment of primary mesenteric arteries were assessed ex vivo using a pressure myograph system. In addition to vessel morphology and myogenic tone, functional assessment of vasocontractility was assessed using α1 adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine (PE) and methoxamine (MET). Results Myogenic tone is significantly impaired in the T3 SCI 1 Week and T3 SCI 1 Month groups compared to the Uninjured Control group (p = 0.0212 and p=0.0059, respectively). EC50 values were extrapolated from PE dose response curves and were lower for both the T3 SCI 1 Week and T3 SCI 1 Month groups compared to the Uninjured Control group (p<0.0001 and p=0.0004, respectively). There are no significant differences found between EC50 values determined for MET. Wall thickness is decreased and vessel diameter is increased in the T3 SCI 1 Month group compared to the Uninjured Control group (p=0.0221 and p=0.066, respectively). Conclusion Hypersensitivity to the α1 adrenoceptor agonist PE but not MET suggest deficiency in the reuptake of norepinephrine in resistance mesenteric vasculature. Decreased wall thickness, in addition to an increased vessel diameter may suggest chronic outward hypotrophic remodelling. Support or Funding Information This research was funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of BC and Yukon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.349
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSpinal Cord Injury Research→French-language works237,207→