MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Autonomic Dysreflexia Persists Following Acute Rehabilitation in Rats with Incomplete Contusive Spinal Cord Injury

2016· article· en· W4389026238 on OpenAlexafffund
Kathryn A. Harman, Kathryn M. DeVeau, Jordan W. Squair, Christopher R. West, David S.K. Magnuson, Andrei V. Krassioukov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAutonomic dysreflexiaMedicineSpinal cord injurySpinal cordRehabilitationAnesthesiaCordSurgeryCardiologyPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Disruption of autonomic pathways following spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to altered cardiovascular (CV) function and homeostasis. The level and completeness of injury have great ramifications on the clinical presentation of CV pathology. Severe cervical and high thoracic lesions disrupt supraspinal control of sympathetic preganglionic neurons of the heart and upper body vasculature, leading to a state in which episodic hypertensive crises known as autonomic dysreflexia (AD) can develop. Rodent studies utilizing complete transection of the upper thoracic cord have shown that appropriately‐timed rehabilitation has the ability to reduce the severity of AD and normalize cardiac function. To date, no study has examined the impact of acute rehabilitation on CV function in a more clinically relevant contusive SCI model. Our objective was to evaluate the effects of either passive hind limb cycling (PHLC) or active swimming therapy on the development and severity of AD following severe T2 contusion. Methods Male Wistar rats with severe T2 contusions (400 kDyn, 5 second dwell, Infinite Horizons Impactor), were randomly divided into three groups: Control (T2‐CON, n=7), PHLC (T2‐ PHLC, n=5), or Swim rehabilitation (T2‐SWIM, n=6). A fourth group received T10 severe contusions and served as injured controls with intact cardiac sympathetic preganglionic pathways (T10‐CON, n=6). Rehabilitation therapy began 7 days post injury, and lasted for three weeks (30 minutes per day, 5 days per week). Five weeks post injury, rats were implanted with telemetric blood pressure devices (Millar, TRM54P) and pressor responses (i.e. AD) induced by colorectal distension (CRD) were evaluated. Results Resting hemodynamics did not differ between T2‐ PHLC, T2‐SWIM, and T2‐CON groups. Animals that received T10 injuries developed resting tachycardia (all groups p < .05). Pressor responses to CRD varied considerably across animals, but were significantly greater in T2 contused animals than in T10‐CON (all groups p < .05), and neither rehabilitation approach was able to attenuate the hypertensive crisis in response to CRD. However, if each group was subdivided based on BBB score, animals with low BBB scores (≤ 6) in the PHLC group were not statistically different from T10‐CON (p = .055). Conversely, both T2‐CON and T2‐SWIM animals with low BBB scores exhibited greater pressor responses during CRD (both groups p < .05). Conclusions Using a clinically relevant contusive model of SCI, we show that neither PHLC nor active swimming rehabilitation has the ability to favorably impact CV responses to CRD in incompletely injured T2 rats. However, if the most severely injured animals are assessed separately (BBB scores ≤ 6), PHLC appears to improve CV homeostasis and reduce the severity of pressor responses during CRD. This data suggests a relationship between locomotor recovery and CV function independent of applied PHLC or swim exercise that may depend more on improvements in hind limb activity and/or tissue sparing at the injury epicenter. Support or Funding Information iCORD VISIT Scholarship, CIHR, CNF, Kentucky Spinal Cord and Head Injury Trust (P30 RR031159), NIH (R56 NS052292), and Friends for Micheal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSpinal Cord Injury Research→French-language works237,207→