MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Tracking Diacylglycerol Pools in Budding Yeast

2016· article· en· W4389026553 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Suriakarthiga Ganesan, Maria Laura Sosa Ponce, Vanina Zaremberg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGreen fluorescent proteinDiacylglycerol kinaseCell biologySubcellular localizationBiologySaccharomyces cerevisiaePhosphatidic acidReporter geneProtein subcellular localization predictionNuclear localization sequenceVacuoleChemistryYeastCytoplasmMembraneBiochemistryProtein kinase CGeneGene expressionSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many diacylglycerol (DAG) sensing probes have been developed to monitor DAG signalling in mammalian cells. Several C1 domains have been fused to fluorescent proteins that can sense DAG in cellular membranes. The C1 domain of PKCδ is very well characterized and known to bind DAG with high affinity, and has been successfully used as a probe fused to GFP in order to monitor DAG in live cells. We have cloned the C1 domain of PKCδ (C1δ) into a centromeric yeast expression vector under a constitutive promoter for in vivo visualization of DAG pools. Localization of C1δ‐GFP was first monitored in different wild type strains grown under standard conditions. The main localization of this DAG‐binding reporter in actively growing cells was the vacuolar membrane, further confirmed by co‐localization with FM4‐64. This localization is consistent with studies done using similar probes to show that DAG localizes to the membrane of isolated vacuoles from yeast cells. Importantly, no changes in vacuolar morphology of wild type cells due to expression of C1δ‐GFP were detected. In addition to vacuolar membrane localization, the C1δ probe also associated with the plasma membrane of daughter cells and at the bud neck. In contrast to the phosphatidic acid (PA)‐binding reporter GFP‐Spo20 51–91 , C1δ‐GFP did not show nuclear localization as determined by co‐localization analysis using the nucleolar marker Sik1‐RFP. We then tested if the localization would change in conditions where lipid homeostasis and levels of DAG are known to be altered. For this, we used cells lacking the four enzymes responsible for the final step in the synthesis of triglycerides in yeast, namely DAG acyltransferase Dga1, the transacylase Lro1, and the steryl acyltransferases Are1 and Are2 (4Δ quadruple mutant), which accumulate DAG and have defects in both nuclear and peripheral ER membrane organization. Localization of the C1δ‐GFP probe drastically changed when expressed in 4Δ quadruple mutant cells, clearly revealing its association with the expanded nuclear and cortical ER in addition to the vacuolar membrane. Additionally, the polarized distribution of C1δ‐GFP to the plasma membrane of buds and daughter cells significantly decreased in the quadruple mutant. After validating the use of this probe in yeast, we investigated the localization of DAG pools in response to lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC) analogues, as we have determined they induce a 5 times increase in DAG levels. Interestingly, incubation with LysoPC analogues induced a drastic change in the localization of DAG while no differences were observed regarding the distribution of PA. These results further support the use of C1δ‐GFP as a valuable tool to track cytosolic accessible pools of DAG in yeast. Support or Funding Information This work was supported by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to VZ

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicLipid metabolism and biosynthesis→French-language works237,207→