MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Does Body Surface Area Independently Alter Whole‐body Sweat Loss during Exercise at a Fixed Absolute Evaporative Requirement for Heat Balance?

2016· article· en· W4389026863 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthew N. Cramer, Geoffrey B. Coombs, Nicholas Ravanelli, Ollie Jay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSWEATChemistryAnimal scienceSteady state (chemistry)CalorimetryEvaporationIntensity (physics)ThermoregulationBody surface areaEndocrinologyThermodynamicsInternal medicineBiologyMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The absolute evaporative requirement for heat balance (E req ) is the principal determinant of whole‐body sweat loss (WBSL) during fixed‐duration exercise in ambient conditions that permit complete sweat evaporation, regardless of body size. However, exercise at a fixed absolute E req in hot/humid conditions may lead to disproportionately greater WBSL among individuals of smaller body surface area (BSA) due to a lower absolute maximum evaporative capacity and thus higher skin wettedness required for heat balance (ω req ) and lower sweating efficiency (S eff ). To test this hypothesis, young adult males of small (SM: 1.81±0.07 m 2 ; n=4) or large (LG: 2.28±0.15 m 2 ; n=3) BSA cycled for 70 min at 34±0.3°C, 71.8±1.3% RH at an exercise intensity set to elicit a fixed VO 2 of 1.5 L/min, and therefore a metabolic heat production of ~450 W and an E req of ~430 W (indirect calorimetry). Body mass was measured at 0, 45, and 70 min to estimate WBSL during non‐steady‐state (0–45 min) and steady‐state (45–70 min) exercise. S eff was calculated as the quotient of the WBSL required to attain E req with complete evaporation and the observed WBSL during the steady‐state period, and expressed as a percentage. The attainment of a steady state (i.e., the actual rate of evaporation equaled the required rate of evaporation) from 45 to 70 min was confirmed by stable esophageal and skin temperatures (±0.1°C throughout steady state). During non‐steady‐state exercise, ω req was not different between groups (SM: 0.81±0.05 g; LG: 0.73±0.08 g; P=0.17), and no between‐group difference in WBSL was observed (SM: 522±81 g; LG: 476±115 g; P=0.56). In contrast, steady‐state ω req was greater in SM (SM: 0.81±0.03; LG: 0.71±0.04; P=0.02), leading to significantly higher WBSL (SM: 361±49 g; LG: 260±54 g; P<0.05) and diminished S eff (SM: 74.1±12.7%; LG: 96.3±6.4%; P=0.04) in the SM group. In summary, our preliminary data suggest that in hot/humid ambient conditions, a large between‐group difference in BSA may lead to disproportionately greater steady‐state WBSL in smaller individuals despite exercising at the same absolute E req due to an independent effect of BSA on S eff . Support or Funding Information Supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant (O. Jay)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207