Cardiac fibroblast growth factor‐16 increases efflux drug (ABC) transporter production and resistance to doxorubicin‐induced cardiomyocyte death
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Doxorubicin (DOX) is a cytotoxic anthracycline antibiotic that is widely used in cancer treatment. However, its cardiotoxic side effects can be fatal, and have long been an issue for cancer patients both in the short and longer term. Strategies are needed to protect the heart. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 16 plays an important role in embryonic mouse heart development. After birth, FGF‐16 is predominantly expressed in the myocardium, and is linked to both anti‐fibrotic and anti‐hypertrophic activities. Supplementation with FGF‐16 increases resistance to DOX‐induced loss of ventricular function in an isolated mouse heart model. However, there is no report on the effects of DOX on endogenous FGF‐16 levels or the mechanism(s) for cardioprotection by FGF‐16. ATP‐binding cassette (ABC) transporters are a family of ATP‐dependent membrane proteins that play an important role in drug distribution and excretion. ABC transporters work as pumps effluxing drugs out of the cell immediately after drug entry thereby reducing cellular drug concentration. Drug concentration positively determines the ABC transporter levels. Previously we showed that FGF‐16 can compete with FGF‐2 binding to the same FGF receptors (FGFRs). Unlike FGF‐16, FGF‐2 is not cardiac‐specific but is cardioprotective and known to induce p‐glycoprotein (MDRs) and multidrug resistance‐associated protein (MRPs) expression in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Our hypothesis is that FGF‐16 protects cardiomyocytes from DOX‐induced cell death by increasing the levels of ABC drug transporters. Our results show that 1 μM DOX induces a time‐dependent decrease in endogenous FGF‐16 RNA levels with a rapid 80% reduction by 2 hours in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. Knockdown of endogenous FGF‐16 levels using siRNA results in a significant increase in apoptotic (Annexin‐V positive) and necrotic (LDH release) cells; this is consistent with endogenous FGF‐16 serving as a cardiac maintenance/survival factor. Overexpression of FGF‐16 using adenoviral delivery significantly and specifically increases efflux drug transporter Mdr1a levels in a dose‐dependent manner. Significant decrease in calcein fluorescence intensity in a functional analysis using calcein AM as a substrate for the efflux drug transporters was consistent with the increased levels of drug transporters RNA post FGF‐16 overexpression. In addition, FGF‐16 adenovirus overexpression in cardiomyocytes treated with 1μM DOX significantly decreased the intracellular DOX concentration as measured by DOX autofluorescence. This was associated with a significant reduction in the apoptotic and necrotic cell population, consistent with a decrease in DOX cytotoxicity. Furthermore, inhibition of FGFR signaling using 20 μM SU5402 blocked the increased efflux effect of the ABC transporters. In conclusion , FGF‐16 increases resistance to DOX‐induced injury by increasing efflux drug transporters via binding to the FGFRs. Understanding the effect of FGF‐16 on drug transporter production and function may offer a further target for intervention in the context of DOX and cardiotoxicity. Support or Funding Information Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and Research Manitoba.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".