MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perinatal Resveratrol Supplementation to Spontaneously Hypertensive Rat Dams Mitigates the Development of Hypertension in Adult Offspring

2016· article· en· W4389027404 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Stephane L. Bourque, Alison S. Care, Miranda M. Sung, Sareh Panahi, Ferrante S. Gragasin, Sandra T. Davidge, Jason R.B. Dyck

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Innovates - Health SolutionsRoyal Alexandra Hospital FoundationStollery Children’s Hospital Foundation
KeywordsOffspringMedicineWeaningInternal medicineBlood pressureEndocrinologySpontaneously hypertensive ratVasodilationHemodynamicsPhysiologyPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is a model of essential hypertension in which high blood pressure (BP) develops after 7 wks of age. Altered vascular resistance profiles and renal hemodynamics are evident by 3 wks of age, implicating these early functional changes as a cause, rather than a consequence, of hypertension in this model. As such, the developmental period before weaning may constitute a critical time for therapeutic intervention. Objective This study was undertaken to determine whether perinatal maternal resveratrol (Resv)—a phytoalexin known to confer cardiovascular protection—could prevent the development of hypertension and improve vascular function in adult SHR offspring. Methods SHR dams were fed either a control or a Resv‐supplemented diet (4g/kg diet) from gestational day 0.5 until postnatal day 21. Indwelling catheters were used to assess BP and vascular function in vivo; wire myography was used to assess vascular reactivity ex vivo . Results Perinatal Resv supplementation in dams had no effect on fetal body weights, albeit continued maternal treatment postnatally resulted in growth restriction in offspring by PD21; growth restriction was no longer evident after 5 wk of age. Maternal perinatal Resv supplementation prevented the onset of hypertension in adult offspring (−18mHg, P=0.007), and L‐NAME treatment normalized these BP differences, suggesting improved NO bioavailability underlies the BP reductions in the SHR+Resv group. In vivo and ex vivo, vascular responses to methylcholine were not different between treatment groups, but prior treatment with L‐NAME attenuated the vasodilation in SHR, but not SHR+Resv adult offspring, suggesting a shift towards NO‐independent vascular control mechanisms in the treated group. Finally, bioconversion of the inactive precursor bET‐1 to active ET‐1 in isolated mesenteric arteries was reduced in SHR+Resv offspring (−28%; P<0.05), and this difference could be normalized by L‐NAME treatment. Conclusion Perinatal Resv mitigated the development of hypertension and causes persistent alterations in vascular responsiveness in SHRs. Support or Funding Information This work is funded by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Women and Children's Health Research Institute through the generous contributions of the Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation and the Royal Alexandra Hospital Foundation. AC was supported by fellowships from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia, Alberta Innovates ‐ Health Solutions, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; SD is a Canada Research Chair in Maternal and Perinatal Cardiovascular Health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207