MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Capillary Response to Skeletal Muscle Contraction: Implications for Redundancy in Microvascular Blood Flow Control

2016· article· en· W4389027529 on OpenAlexaffabout
Iain Lamb, Coral L. Murrant

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDilatorSkeletal muscleMicrocirculationArterioleVasodilationCremaster muscleChemistryIntravital microscopyContraction (grammar)Internal medicineAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Redundancy, during active hyperaemia (AH), describes a regulatory control paradigm in which the vasoactive effect of a dilator can be amplified to compensate for the loss of another vasodilator's effect. This paradigm necessitates that some dilators exert an inhibitory influence on the dilatory ability of others. Thus, the compromised release of one dilator would remove its inhibition on another dilator thereby amplifying its effect to compensate for its loss. We have previously shown redundant signalling between dilators in arterioles of skeletal muscle microcirculation (Lamb & Murrant, 2015). However, given the importance of capillaries in the coordination of blood flow to active skeletal muscle we sought to determine whether redundancy is important at this vascular level. Using intravital microscopy of the hamster cremaster we stimulated capillaries via micropipette application of metabolic dilators and assessed changes in diameter of the upstream terminal arteriole, associated with the stimulated capillary. Alone, potassium (K + , 10mM), nitric oxide (NO) donor S‐Nitroso‐N‐acetylpenicillamine (10 −6 M) and adenosine (ADO, 10 −6 M) caused a conducted response (CR) up the vascular tree. However, the magnitude of NO and ADO's CR was significantly blunted when added in the presence of KCl, demonstrating that dilators relevant to contraction can exert inhibitory influences on other dilators at the capillary level. We then aimed to determine the physiological relevance of redundant interactions during muscle contraction. CRs were elicited by contracting skeletal muscle fibres underlying capillary modules (via a microelectrode) for 2 minutes at 6,15, 24 and 60 contractions per minute (cpm). We found that inhibition of NO, via NO synthase inhibitor L‐N G ‐Nitroarginine methyl ester (L‐NAME, 10 −6 M), significantly blunted the CR elicited by 6, 15 and 24cpm by ~102%, ~92%, and ~46%, respectively, but the CR elicited by 60cpm was unaffected. Presumably NO would be present during all contraction frequencies but we have shown it was not effective in mediating the CR at 60cpm. Based on the data from the micropipette protocol we hypothesized that K + may be inhibiting NO's effectiveness. To determine whether K + was exerting an inhibitory influence on NO at high contraction frequencies we antagonized K + release, via inhibition of voltage‐gated K + channels using 3,4‐Diaminopyridine (DAP, 3×10 −4 M), in addition to L‐NAME during contraction. In the presence of L‐NAME and DAP the CR elicited by 60cpm was significantly blunted by ~79%, showing that in the absence of K + NO plays a significant role in mediating the CR elicited by 60cpm. Given that interstitial K + concentration ([K + ] i ) is correlated with muscle contraction we postulated that at low contraction frequencies [K + ] i may not be sufficient in attenuating NO's dilatory ability, but as contraction frequency increases the associated increase in [K + ] i may be sufficient in exerting an inhibitory effect on NO. Together our data demonstrate that inhibitory effects between vasodilators exist at the level of the capillary. Further, we have shown that these interactions are important during muscle contraction, demonstrating the physiological relevance of redundancy. This fundamentally shifts our understanding of blood flow regulation during skeletal muscle activity, as these data provide evidence that AH is governed by a complex redundant interplay between dilators. Support or Funding Information NSERC Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→