MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Minocycline Partially Restores Blood Pressure Regulation After Experimental Spinal Cord Injury

2017· article· en· W4389028671 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ian A Ruiz‐Romero, Jordan W. Squair, Ray Gopaul, Jie Liu, Christopher R. West, Andrei V. Krassioukov

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpinal Cord Injury Research
Canadian institutionsGF Strong Rehabilitation CentreInternational Collaboration On Repair DiscoveriesUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCraig H. Neilsen FoundationHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsAutonomic dysreflexiaMedicineSpinal cord injuryMinocyclineAnesthesiaNeuroprotectionStroke (engine)Blood pressureSpinal cordInternal medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE Cardiovascular dysfunction, which manifests as chronic hypotension, autonomic dysreflexia, and orthostatic hypotension, is common after high‐level spinal cord injury (SCI), likely contributing to this population's dramatically increased odds for stroke and heart disease. The degree of dysfunction is thought to be less severe in those with a greater preservation of descending sympatho‐excitatory axons; hence, therapies targeting the preservation of these axons in the acute stages of SCI may improve cardiovascular function and reduce cardiovascular disease risk in people with SCI. Minocycline, a clinically available antibiotic with anti‐inflammatory properties, has demonstrated extremely promising neuroprotective effects through myelin preservation in a variety of animal models and improved motor recovery in a groundbreaking preliminary human trial. As such, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of minocycline on both the motor and cardiovascular systems in a well‐established animal model. DESIGN/METHODS 32 Male Wistar rats were randomized to either a treatment group (minocycline; n=14) or a control group (vehicle; n=18), and were followed for 2 months post‐SCI. All rats received a T3 severe contusion (Infinite‐Horizons impactor, 400kdyn, 5s dwell time). Minocycline (or saline vehicle) was administered at 1 hour post‐injury (90mg/kg), then every twelve hours for two weeks (45mg/kg). Baseline hemodynamics and the severity of autonomic dysreflexia were assessed at 2 months post‐injury using an implantable telemetry blood pressure device (right carotid approach) under urethane anesthesia. Autonomic dysreflexia was induced by inserting a balloon‐tipped catheter in the rectum (i.e. colorectal distension). Baseline motor behaviour (Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan [BBB] method) was also assessed pre‐SCI and every 7 days until study end‐point. RESULTS We show that the acute administration of minocycline significantly improves resting systolic blood pressure (107±1.5mmHg) compared to vehicle (98±2.2mmHg; p=0.034). Moreover, the severity of autonomic dysreflexia in response to colorectal distension was remarkably reduced by 33% in animals treated with minocycline (p=0.025). In contrast to the cardiovascular improvements, there were no differences in motor function (BBB score) between the minocycline and vehicle groups (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS We examined the effect of minocycline administration on cardiovascular function following SCI and provide the first evidence that this promising drug is able to improve baseline hemodynamics. Furthermore, the diminished severity of autonomic dysreflexia following treatment may indicate a more robust preservation of cardiovascular autonomic function compared to those without treatment. That we saw no concomitant improvement in motor function suggests that determining the independent impact of both existing and novel neuroprotective drugs on motor and cardiovascular function is critical. Support or Funding Information The lab of AV Krassioukov is supported by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, and the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation. This project was supported by a SEED grant from the International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.402
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicSpinal Cord Injury Research→French-language works237,207→