MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389029223 · doi:10.1016/j.ajt.2026.04.010

920. A Phase 2 Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Assess the Clinical and Antiviral Efficacy and Safety of Nitazoxanide for the Treatment of Norovirus in Hematopoietic Stem Cell and Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

2023· article· en· W4389029223 on OpenAlexaff
C Boutin, Michelle Callegari, Diana F. Florescu, M. Hong Nguyen, Daniel Kaul, Robin K. Avery, Pearlie P. Chong, Cynthia E. Fisher, Ajit P. Limaye, Lisa Clough, Steven A. Pergam, Michael D. Green, Marian G. Michaels, Lara Danziger‐Isakov, Michael Angarone, Laurie Keefer, Amna Daud, Michael G. Ison

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Transplantation · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersAstellas PharmaModernaDivision of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCidara TherapeuticsRegeneron PharmaceuticalsMedpaceNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesPfizerBristol-Myers SquibbNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsMedicineNorovirusNitazoxanideClinical endpointPlaceboInternal medicinePopulationAdverse effectRandomizationViral loadDiarrheaRandomized controlled trialClinical trialGastroenterologyImmunologyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Virus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Norovirus (NoV) results in potentially severe, relapsing, remitting diarrhea in immunocompromised hosts (ICH). A number of interventions, including nitazoxanide (NTZ), have been tried with unclear success in managing cases of NoV in ICH. Methods We conducted a NIH-sponsored multi-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study of NTZ for the treatment of Norovirus in adult HSCT and SOT recipients between 2018 and 2021. Subjects with a positive Norovirus test within 14 days of enrollment and active GI symptoms were randomly assigned (1:1) to NTZ 500 mg twice daily or placebo (P) for 56 consecutives doses and were followed for 6 months, including patient reported outcomes (PRO) diary assessments. Primary endpoint was to determine the clinical efficacy, assessed as the time from randomization until symptoms resolution for at least 48 hours. Secondary endpoints included virologic efficacy assessed as the time from randomization to first negative viral load and safety through frequency of adverse events. Results 31 subjects (16 NTZ, 15 P) were enrolled and had balanced demographics (See Table 1). Early withdrawal was documented in 5 subjects from each group. Thirty (30) had received solid organ transplants. Most had chronic ( > 14 days) symptoms (77%). In the mITT population, the median time to initial clinical resolution was 19.0 days (95% CI: 1.0, 31.0) for the Nitazoxanide group and 11.0 days (95% CI: 2.0, 14.0) for the placebo group (p-value=0.459). The difference between time to first negative viral load for the Norovirus GII genotype was not significant (p-value=0.873). Patients appear to have clinical improvement based on PRO results while on active therapy. No serious adverse event related to the study treatment was documented. One severe unsolicited adverse event, abdominal pain, was reported on the day of first dose NTZ. Hospitalization and non-serious or laboratory adverse events were not significantly different between the two arms. Analysis of PK and viral genetics is ongoing and will be reported at the meeting. Conclusion NTZ did not shorten time to clinical resolution or viral shedding duration but may have resulted in transient symptom improvement. Although NTZ appears safe, its role is likely limited in the setting of chronic NoV among ICHs. Disclosures Daniel Kaul, MD, Medscape: Honoraria|Nobelpharma: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Grant/Research Support Robin K. Avery, MD, Aicuris: Grant/Research Support|Astellas: Grant/Research Support|Astra-Zeneca: Grant/Research Support|Chimerix: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Oxford Immunotec: Grant/Research Support|Qiagen: Grant/Research Support|Regeneron: Grant/Research Support|Takeda: Grant/Research Support Ajit Limaye, Professor/MD, MedPace: DSMB member|merck: Advisor/Consultant|merck: Grant/Research Support|moderna: Advisor/Consultant|moderna: site investigator|syneos: DSMB member Steven A. Pergam, MD, MPH, Cidara: Investigator in clinical trials|F2G: Investigator in clinical trials|Global Life Technologies: Grant/Research Support|Symbio: Investigator in clinical trials Michael D. Green, MD, MPH, ADMA: Advisor/Consultant|Allovir: Advisor/Consultant|Bristol Myers Squibb: Advisor/Consultant|ITB-MED: Advisor/Consultant Marian G. Michaels, MD, MPH, Merck: Grant/Research Support|Viracor: Grant/Research Support Lara A. Danziger-Isakov, MD, MPH, Aicuris: Contracted Clinical Research|Ansun Biopharma: Contracted Clinical Research|Astellas: Contracted Clinical Research|GSK: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Contracted Clinical Research|Pfizer: Contracted Clinical Research|Roche Diagnostics: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Advisor/Consultant|Takeda: Contracted Clinical Research Michael P. Angarone, DO, Abbvie Pharmeciuticals: Advisor/Consultant|DKBMed Inc: Advisor/Consultant|DKBMed Inc: Honoraria

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of TransplantationSame topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207