MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389032146 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofad500.2355

2744. A 5-Year Single-Center Review of <i>Strongyloides</i> Seropositivity in Kidney Transplant Candidates in Rural Central Texas

2023· article· en· W4389032146 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robin Snellings, Collin Telchik, Sowmya Padakanti, Juan Negron-Diaz, Lizbeth Cahuayme‐Zuniga

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis Viruses Studies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStrongyloides stercoralisStrongyloidesPopulationStrongyloidiasisAsymptomaticTransplantationPediatricsInternal medicineImmunologyEnvironmental healthHelminths

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The American Society of Transplantation recommends screening for Strongyloides stercoralis for people from or with extended travel to endemic areas including tropical regions of Southeast Asia and the Appalachian region of the United States. Asymptomatic carriers without risk factors can potentially be missed during screening assessments. Consequently, they can develop deadly hyperinfection and disseminated disease with immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this study is to identify demographics and characteristics among our population of Strongyloides-infected kidney transplant candidates in rural Central Texas. Methods This study is a single-center, retrospective chart review of patients aged 18 or older who underwent evaluation for kidney transplant at our institution in rural Central Texas between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2022 and tested equivocal or positive for serum Strongyloides IgG antibody. Results Out of the 1653 patients who underwent Strongyloides screening during their evaluation for kidney transplant within the study period, 182 (11.0%) returned as either equivocal or positive. Demographics of this Strongyloides-infected population are noted in table 1. 86.3% of these patients were born in the United States or Canada, 6.6% from Mexico, and 3.3% from Asia. 33.0% reported no international travel outside the United States (table 1). Comorbidities and symptoms of our population are listed in table 2. 83.5% were asymptomatic. Laboratory data and other risk factors for Strongyloides infection are noted in table 3. Only 6.0% had eosinophilia at time of diagnosis (considered as greater than 0.00 - 0.76 10*9/L). None of our population tested positive for human T-lymphotrophic virus (HTLV-1). Out of the 69 patients who were asked, 71.0% reported a history of walking outside barefoot. Demographic information and international travel outside the United States Patient comorbidities and symptoms Laboratory data and other risk factors Conclusion Importantly, 11.0% of our population were found to have an equivocal or positive Strongyloides serology. Of those, 33.0% had no apparent risk factors for Strongyloides infection including international travel, suggesting local acquisition of the infection in rural Central Texas. More research is needed to identify unique risk factors for this population including environmental studies of this underserved population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicHepatitis Viruses Studies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207