MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4389040423 · doi:10.1090/tran/9086

đ¶^{1,1-𝜖} isometric embeddings

2023· preprint· lv· W4389040423 on OpenAlexfundno aff
A. L. Martinez

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society · 2023
Typepreprint
Languagelv
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGrantovĂĄ Agentura ČeskĂ© RepublikyJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceLeibniz-GemeinschaftIstituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica "Francesco Severi"Institute for Advanced Study
KeywordsIsometric exerciseMathematicsComputer scienceMedicinePhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we use the convex integration technique enhanced by an extra iteration originally due to KĂ€llĂ©n and revisited by Kröner to provide a local h h -principle for isometric embeddings in the class C 1 , 1 − Δ C^{1,1-\varepsilon } for n n -dimensional manifolds in codimension 1 2 n ( n + 1 ) \frac {1}{2}n(n+1) .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Mathematical Society→Same topicMatrix Theory and Algorithms→French-language works237,207→