MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389040801 · doi:10.1101/2023.11.26.568761

scGeneRythm: Using Neural Networks and Fourier Transformation to Cluster Genes by Time-Frequency Patterns in Single-Cell Data

2023· preprint· en· W4389040801 on OpenAlexafffund
Yiming Jia, Hao Wu, Jun Ding

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGeneComputational biologyCluster analysisBiologyTransformation (genetics)Gene regulatory networkDomain (mathematical analysis)Gene clusterFrequency domainGene expressionComputer scienceGeneticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clustering genes in single-cell RNA sequencing plays a pivotal role in unraveling a plethora of biological processes, from cell differentiation to disease progression and metabolic pathways. Traditional time-domain methods are instrumental in certain analyses, yet they may overlook intricate relationships. For instance, genes that appear distinct in the time domain might exhibit striking similarities in the frequency domain. Recognizing this, we present scGeneRhythm, an innovative deep learning technique that employs Fourier transformation. This approach captures the rich tapestry of gene expression from both the time and frequency domains. When evaluated across a spectrum of single-cell datasets, scGeneRhythm consistently outperforms conventional approaches. The gene clusters it identifies not only demonstrate heightened statistical significance in enriched pathways but also bring to light underlying gene relationships previously obscured. Through integrating frequency-domain data, scGeneRhythm not only refines gene grouping but also uncovers pivotal biological insights, such as nuanced gene rhythmicity. By deploying scGeneRhythm, we foster a richer, multi-dimensional understanding of gene expression dynamics, enriching the potential avenues of cellular and molecular biology research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207