MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389041486 · doi:10.1089/soro.2023.0085

Deformation Characteristics of Three-Dimensional Spiral Soft Actuator Driven by Water Hydraulics for Underwater Manipulator

2023· article· en· W4389041486 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoft Robotics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoft Robotics and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderwaterActuatorFinite element methodSoft roboticsSpiral (railway)BendingDeformation (meteorology)Marine engineeringMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringStructural engineeringSimulationMaterials scienceGeologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emergence of bionic soft robots has led to an increased demand for bionic soft actuating ends. In this study, a three-dimensional spiral water hydraulic soft actuator (3D-SWHSA), inspired by the winding action of an elephant's trunk, is proposed to provide a more targeted soft actuator catching method. The 3D-SWHSA is composed of multiple bending and twisting units (BATUs), which can produce winding deformation after being pressed. By using the principles of virtual work and integrating the Yeoh 3rd order model, a predictive model for winding was established to investigate the bending and twisting characteristics of BATUs with varying structural parameters through finite element simulation. Following the selection of an optimal set of structural parameters for the 3D-SWHSA, its bending and deformation capabilities were simulated using finite element analysis and subsequently validated experimentally. To validate its flexibility, adaptability, and biocompatibility, successful catching experiments were conducted in both air and underwater environments. Underwater organisms, including organisms with soft appearance such as starfish and sea cucumbers, and organisms with hard shell, such as sea snails and crabs, can also be caught harmlessly. In cases where a single 3D-SWHSA is insufficient for capturing objects with unstable centers of gravity or when the capture range is exceeded, the double 3D-SWHSAs can be utilized for cooperative winding. This study affirms the great potential of 3D-SWHSA in diverse marine applications, including but not limited to marine exploration, fishing, and operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.529
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it