MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Nuclear Charge Radius of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>26</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> and Its Implication for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> in the Quark Mixing Matrix

2023· article· lv· W4389044178 on OpenAlexafffund
P. Plattner, Edward J. Wood, L. Al Ayoubi, O. Beliuskina, M. L. Bissell, K. Blaum, P. Campbell, B. Cheal, R. P. de Groote, C. S. Devlin, T. Eronen, Livio Filippin, R. F. García Ruíz, Z. W. Ge, S. Geldhof, W. Gins, Michel Godefroid, H. Heylen, M. Hukkanen, Phillip Imgram, A. Jaries, A. Jokinen, A. Kanellakopoulos, A. Kankainen, S. Kaufmann, Kristian König, Á. Koszorús, S. Kujanpää, S. Lechner, S. Malbrunot-Ettenauer, Patrick Müller, R. Mathieson, I. D. Moore, W. Nörtershäuser, D. A. Nesterenko, R. Neugart, G. Neyens, A. Ortiz-Cortes, I. Pohjalainen, A. Raggio, M. Reponen, S. Rinta-Antila, L. V. Rodríguez, J. Romero, R. Sánchez, F. Sommer, M. Stryjczyk, V. Virtanen, Liang Xie, Z. Y. Xu, X. F. Yang, D. T. Yordanov

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersNational Research Council CanadaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilVlaamse regeringFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekTRIUMFKU LeuvenBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeHelmholtz International Center for FAIRMax-Planck-GesellschaftDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsCharge radiusCharge (physics)PhysicsRADIUSIsospinIsotopeAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsParticle physicsNuclear physicsProtonChemistryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Collinear laser spectroscopy was performed on the isomer of the aluminium isotope ^{26m}Al. The measured isotope shift to ^{27}Al in the 3s^{2}3p ^{2}P_{3/2}^{○}→3s^{2}4s ^{2}S_{1/2} atomic transition enabled the first experimental determination of the nuclear charge radius of ^{26m}Al, resulting in R_{c}=3.130(15) fm. This differs by 4.5 standard deviations from the extrapolated value used to calculate the isospin-symmetry breaking corrections in the superallowed β decay of ^{26m}Al. Its corrected Ft value, important for the estimation of V_{ud} in the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix, is thus shifted by 1 standard deviation to 3071.4(1.0) s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.870
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.007
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0070.007
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6080.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207