MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389045017 · doi:10.59491/dcxr1870

Cuttings from an Illustrated Twelfth-Century French Manuscript Bible in Los Angeles and Berlin

2023· article· en· W4389045017 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Beatrice Alai, Peter Kidd

Bibliographic record

VenueGetty Research Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Context (archaeology)ArtCuttingHistoryClassicsArt historyAncient historyArchaeologyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A historiated initial depicting the Old Testament prophet Micah, cut probably in the nineteenth century from a twelfth-century illuminated manuscript and acquired by the J. Paul Getty Museum in 1989, is here placed in its temporal, geographical, and religious context through an examination of its decoration, script, and text, in combination with the evidence provided by fifty further cuttings from the same manuscript in Berlin—most of them unpublished—and one in a private collection. From this study it emerges that the cuttings come from a Bible written in the third quarter of the twelfth century in southeastern France for a Carthusian monastery in the orbit of the Grande Chartreuse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGetty Research JournalSame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207