MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389049901 · doi:10.9734/bpi/cras/v5/6649d

Historical Developments of Flax Industry for Improving Fibers Quality and Fabrics Properties

2020· book-chapter· en· W4389049901 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hassan Moawad, Wafaa M. Abd El‐Rahim, Gebreil M. M. Gebreil, Mohamed Hashem, Mohamed Zakaria

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicTextile materials and evaluations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRettingBast fibreLinumLigninFiberCellulosePectinSteam explosionLinseed oilCellulose fiberPulp and paper industryMaterials scienceChemistryPolymer scienceComposite materialFood scienceBotanyOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Flax (Linum usitatissimu) is one of the main crops in Canada for the production of linseed oil, which is used in food and chemical industries. The seeds are crushed to make linseed oil, and the remaining cake is used for fodder. Moreover, the boiling of seed oil is used in making paints, varnish and printing ink. The degradation of flax fibers is a crucial aspect in the development of natural fiber. Cellulose controls the major degradation behavior of flax fibers. Retting of flax is the separation of fibers and fiber bundles from non-fiber tissues in the stems. Bast fibers are processed by various means that may include retting, breaking, scutching, hackling, and combing. In order to bleach the flax and to keep the fiber tenacity high enough it is necessary to remove the lignin and partially to preserve the pectin. The problem of the classical hydrolyzing treatment with alkalis and oxidizers is due to the effect of these chemicals not only on the pectin and the lignin but also the cellulose itself resulting on the drastically decrease the material strength

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTextile materials and evaluationsFrench-language works237,207