MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluation of bulls-producers of the Holstein breed by the quality of the offspring

2023· article· en· W4389058464 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. S. Gorelik, Максим Ребезов, О. В. Горелик

Bibliographic record

VenueAgrarian science · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood Industry and Aquatic Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMilkingBreedProductivityBiologyPopulationAgricultural scienceAnimal scienceMilk productionBiotechnologyDemographyEconomicsEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Relevance. Providing the population of the country with full-fledged food products of its own production is an important task facing the employees of the agro-industrial complex of the country. Such a product is milk. Milk is obtained mainly from dairy cows of productivity, the improvement of breeding qualities of which is due to the use of the global gene pool of the Holstein breed. The widespread use of Holstein bulls of various breeding breeds in the breeding of dairy cattle and the study of their influence on the productive qualities of daughters are relevant and have both scientific and practical interest. Methods. A comparison of the productivity of the daughters of four bulls-producers – Alta Bloomberg (country of origin – USA), Bourbon (Denmark), Norton (Germany) and Lisborn (Canada). Dairy productivity (milk yield, fat content, protein in milk) of cows was controlled by control milking, reproductive capacity – by the duration of the service period and the coefficient of reproductive capacity. Results. As a result of the research, it was found that the difference in milk yield between the peers of bulls-producers is unreliable, but there is a tendency for higher milk yields in the daughters of Alt Bloomberg, Norton and Lisborn, relative to Bourbon. In the milk of the daughters of Alt Bloomberg and Norton, the indicators for MJ in milk are higher (p ≤ 0.05–0.01), and Bourbon – MDB (p ≤ 0.01 in favor of the daughters of Bourbon). A significant difference in the age of achieving the first insemination was revealed between the groups of daughters of the evaluated bulls in favor of Bourbon daughters (Denmark) at p < 0.05–0.01. They reached the required body weight at the age of 12.9 months, which is 0.4–1.2 months faster. The daughters of breeding bulls have certain problems with reproduction. The coefficient of reproductive ability of cows is in the range of 0.89–0.94, which is below the optimal indicators for a good level of reproduction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgrarian scienceSame topicFood Industry and Aquatic BiologyFrench-language works237,207