Dynamics of displacement flows of viscoplastic fluids in obstructed eccentric annuli at moderate Reynolds numbers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a sequel to Mitishita et al. [“Turbulent displacement flows of viscoplastic fluids in obstructed eccentric annuli: Experiments,” Phys. Fluids 34, 053114 (2022)], we present an experimental study of laminar displacement flows in obstructed eccentric annuli. Xanthan gum (XG) solutions (0.35%, 0.50%, or 0.75%) are used to displace a 0.15% viscoplastic Carbopol solution. The eccentricity of the annulus section is set to near 0.5. We study the effect of a solid obstruction in the narrow side of the annulus, similar to that provided by a consolidated residual cuttings bed, and compare the results to unobstructed displacement flows. While we predicted that all displacements would be in the laminar regime, we actually observe mixed regimes where the initial displacement of Carbopol can be transitional or turbulent. With the obstruction on the narrow side of the annulus, we observe the formation of cavities in the Carbopol layer, both upstream and downstream of the obstruction. We believe that the cavities are formed because the obstruction behaves like an abrupt contraction/expansion. This geometric irregularity affects the velocity profiles of the displacing fluid near the obstruction. Once the cavities reach the bottom of the pipe, we observe that the remaining Carbopol layer is more easily eroded. The dynamics of the Carbopol removal also share similarities to cleaning of soil layers in pipes, as described by Palabiyik et al. [“Flow regimes in the emptying of pipes filled with a Herschel–Bulkley fluid,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 92, 2201–2212 (2014)].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".