Transitions socioécologiques et milieux de vie : entre expérimentation, politisation et institutionnalisation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Face à la crise climatique, la transition socioécologique se déploie sous la forme d’initiatives citoyennes qui cherchent à transformer les milieux de vie et qui s’organisent autour de pratiques dans différents domaines d’action, notamment en matière de zéro-déchets, de verdissement, de modes d’habiter ou de production d’énergie. La politisation de ces actions est variée et non linéaire : certains prônent une transformation profonde du monde, d’autres revendiquent une place pour des expérimentations citoyennes qui évitent le conflit. \n \nCet ouvrage, qui explore les liens entre les actions publiques et collectives ainsi que les effets de l’action citoyenne sur les politiques existantes, intéressera autant les chercheurs et les militants que les intervenants dans l’accompagnement des transitions et les aménageurs. Il met l’accent sur l’environnementalisme du quotidien, là où les citoyens préfigurent d’autres modes de vie, ainsi que sur la pérennisation de ces expérimentations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.054 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".