Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy (ISTDP) is a transdiagnostic treatment method rooted in the psychodynamic tradition. A basic assumption is that many of our feelings, thoughts, desires and inner conflicts are inaccessible to our consciousness and thereby trigger and maintain psychological problems. In the 1960s, the Canadian psychoanalyst and psychiatrist Habib Davanloo began developing the original ‘standard format’ of ISTDP. After continuously studying video recordings of his treatment sessions, Davanloo systematised effective factors which he could use in subsequent treatment sessions. In the 1990s, he further developed a ‘graded format’ of ISTDP with interventions that could be adapted to patients who are easily overwhelmed by anxiety and other emotions. In this article, we take a closer look at how ISTDP operationalises ‘unconscious anxiety’ and ‘unconscious therapeutic alliance’ as observable markers that provide the therapist with information about the therapeutic process and about the choice of interventions, illustrated through the case of Nadine. Keywords: Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy, ISTDP, conflicting emotions, unconscious anxiety, unconscious therapeutic alliance
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".