Discovering Secondary Protein Structures via Local Euler Curvature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein structure analysis and classification, which is fundamental for predicting protein function, still poses formidable challenges in the fields of molecular biology, mathematics, physics and computer science. In the present work we exploit recent advances in computational topology to define a new intrinsic unsupervised topological fingerprint for proteins. These fingerprints, computed via Local Euler Curvature (LECs), identify secondary protein structures, such as Helices and Sheets, by capturing their distinctive topological signatures. Using an extensive protein residue database, the proposed computational framework not only distinguishes between structural classes via unsupervised clustering but also achieves remarkable accuracy in classifying proteins structures through supervised machine learning classifier. We also show that the internal structure of LEC space embeds the information about the secondary structure of proteins. Beyond its immediate implications for the advancement of critical application areas such as drug design and biotechnology, our approach opens a fascinating avenue towards characterizing the multiscale structures of diverse biopolymers based solely on their geometric and topological attributes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".