Porous Semiconducting K–Sn–Mo–S Aerogel: Synthesis, Local Structure, and Ion-Exchange Properties
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chalcogenide-based aerogels are emerging porous semiconducting nanomaterials that appeal to applications in clean energy and the environment. Here, we report a novel gel, potassium–tin–molybdenum–sulfides (KTMS), that integrates the electrostatically bound K + ions in the covalent network of Sn–Mo–S. Its gelation requires a concurrent reduction of Mo 6+ → Mo 4+/5+ and the oxidation of S 2– → S n – ( n ≈ 1) and Sn 2+ → Sn 4+ . KTMS is an amorphous semiconductor showing quantum confinement effects on band gap energies, 2.1 → 1.4 → 0.9 eV for its wet- → aero- → xerogels. Synchrotron X-ray pair distribution function (PDF) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) revealed a complex local structure of KTMS consisting of molecular Mo 2 (S 2 ) 6 and Mo 3 S(S 2 ) 6 clusters. In addition, the Sn–S coordination is related to crystalline Na 4 Sn 3 S 8 and SnS 2 . KTMS also demonstrated the removal of the radionuclides of Cs +, Sr 2+, and UO 2 2+ from ppm to ppb levels with distribution constants ( K d ) up to ≥10 4 mL/g. Notably, despite the lack of atomic periodicity in the amorphous KTMS, the K + ion is ion-exchangeable with chemically diverse Sr 2+, Cs +, and UO 2 2+ in aqueous solutions; especially the ion-exchange properties of Sr 2+ and UO 2 2+ ≡(O═U═O) 2+ is not known to any chalcogels known to date. The sequestration of Cs + and Sr 2+ was achieved by the exchange of K + in the amorphous KTMS, and the removal of [O═U 6+ ═O] 2+ synergistically involves surface sorption via ─S ···· U 6+ ═O 2 2+ covalent interactions and ion-exchange via the hard–soft Lewis acid–base paradigm. Overall, cooperative roles played by the diverse bonding motifs, surface-exposed Lewis basic frameworks, and polarizability of the (poly)sulfides make it an exceptional adsorbent for chemically diverse radioactive species. This finding will guide the design of superior sorbents for chemically distinct metal ion separation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".