MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Polymer-Based Virtual Sensor Array Leveraging Fringing Field Capacitance for VOC Detection

2023· article· en· W4389077464 on OpenAlexafffund
Gian Carlo Antony Raj, Youssef Ezzat Elnemr, Pavithra Munirathinam, Yumna Birjis, Calvin Love, Arezoo Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Chemical Sensor Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaWindsor Cancer Centre FoundationCMC Microsystems
KeywordsCapacitanceMaterials scienceSensitivity (control systems)Dielectric spectroscopyAnalyteOptoelectronicsSensor arrayPrincipal component analysisPolymerComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrodeElectrochemistryChemistryChromatographyArtificial intelligenceEngineeringComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is crucial in various applications, from environmental monitoring to industrial safety. Through this paper we present a comparative analysis of a polymer-based virtual sensor array (VSA) for VOC detection, utilizing fringing field capacitance to enhance sensitivity and potentially reduce the size of sensor arrays required to differentiate VOC analytes. Polymer-based sensors exhibit changes in material permittivity in response to VOCs, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measures the resultant change in capacitance. Principal component analysis (PCA) is used to extract subtle patterns from the multivariate EIS data for the identification and differentiation of different VOCs. Results demonstrate superior sensitivity and differentiation capability over conventional rectangular IDE reference design. This research demonstrates the potential of a polymer-based virtual sensor array leveraging fringing field capacitance in VOC detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.517
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Chemical Sensor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207