MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Novel Preference Scale Function Based on Poincaré Metric for Decision-Making

2023· article· en· W4389077567 on OpenAlexaff
Youpeng Yang, Sanghyuk Lee, Haolan Zhang, Witold Pedrycz, Kyeong Soo Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMulti-Criteria Decision Making
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreferenceMetric (unit)Scale (ratio)Function (biology)Construct (python library)Computer sciencePoincaré conjectureMembership functionMathematicsMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceFuzzy logicAlgorithmFuzzy setStatisticsPure mathematicsEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel preference scale function based on the Poincare metric for decision-making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets (IFSs). We first introduce a pair of two-dimensional vectors expressing the IFSs in multi-criteria decision-making problems, which satisfy the Poincare metric, and then construct a preference scale function based on it. The proposed scale function can address, without resorting to the accuracy function, the issue of the existing score function for IFSs returning zero scores when membership and non-membership degrees of an element are the same. The advantages of the proposed scale function over the existing ones are demonstrated through illustrative examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.281
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMulti-Criteria Decision MakingFrench-language works237,207