MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transmission System Usage Amount Planning by Brazilian Distribution Utilities

2023· article· en· W4389077710 on OpenAlexaff
Bárbara Resende Rosado, Marcos J. Rider, Walmir Freitas, Bala Venkatesh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInefficiencyComputer sciencePeak demandContext (archaeology)Transmission systemWork (physics)Transmission (telecommunications)Operations researchDemand forecastingLinear programmingDistribution (mathematics)Mathematical optimizationReliability engineeringElectricityTelecommunicationsEngineeringEconomicsElectrical engineeringMicroeconomicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increase of distributed generators and energy storage devices in modern distribution systems impacts the demand provided by the distribution utility and, hence, the techniques employed to determine the Transmission System Usage Amount at the border with the transmission system. If the contracted demand is violated, the utility must pay inefficiency charges. The complexity of this new reality is the stochastic characteristics associated with the new devices installed at medium and low voltage levels. In this context, this work proposes a methodology composed of a linear programming model to determine the demand to be contracted by the distribution utility. This work incorporates the problem uncertainties by integrating historical data and demand forecasting from the distribution utility and the Brazilian Energy Research Company. The developed methodology obtained a 1.5% error compared to the contracted demand which would lead to the minimum annual demand cost when applied to a Brazilian system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207