MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4389083028 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.095045

Photon-dark photon conversion with multiple level crossings

2023· article· en· W4389083028 on OpenAlexafffund
Nirmalya Brahma, Asher Berlin, Katelin Schutz

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesOffice of ScienceCanada First Research Excellence FundCanada Research ChairsGovernment of CanadaInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInnovation, Science and Economic Development CanadaFermilabU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsPhotonKinetic energyDark photonRange (aeronautics)Quantum electrodynamicsMixing (physics)Computational physicsAtomic physicsQuantum mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dark photons can oscillate into Standard Model (SM) photons via kinetic mixing. The conversion probability depends sensitively on properties of the ambient background, such as the density and electromagnetic field strength, which cause the SM photon to acquire an in-medium effective mass. Resonances can enhance the conversion probability when there is a level-crossing between the dark photon and background-dependent SM photon states. In this work, we show that the widely used Landau-Zener (LZ) approximation breaks down when there are multiple level-crossings due to a nonmonotonic SM photon potential. Phase interference effects, especially when the dark photon mass is close to an extremum of the SM photon effective mass, can cause deviations from the LZ approximation at the level of a few orders of magnitude in the conversion probability. We present an analytic approximation that is valid in this regime and that can accurately predict the conversion probabilities in a wide range of astrophysical environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicDark Matter and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207